Connor Smith wrote: "I was rather against these hydroponic propagators as I didn't think they were needed nor had they been tested on any challenging species.
After hearing repeated positive things I caved and got one to test. I have converted.
While the design is rather shoddy it has worked on some tricky species such as
Sorbus gilgitiana 1st pic.
Allowing cuttings in the busy peak seasons with next to no additional work, a massive plus. Herbaceous species are often quick and easy. Like the hardy
Costus in the 2nd picture. So far I have had little trouble after potting them up. A good asset, not a replacement."
![Hydroponic propagator](https://www.srgc.org.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=e511f0ffc06e3c0e44beac2a2fe91ac5&action=dlattach;topic=19566.0;attach=721961;image)
![Hydroponic propagator](https://www.srgc.org.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=e511f0ffc06e3c0e44beac2a2fe91ac5&action=dlattach;topic=19566.0;attach=721963;image)
![Hydroponic propagator](https://www.srgc.org.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=e511f0ffc06e3c0e44beac2a2fe91ac5&action=dlattach;topic=19566.0;attach=721965;image)
![Hydroponic propagator](https://www.srgc.org.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=e511f0ffc06e3c0e44beac2a2fe91ac5&action=dlattach;topic=19566.0;attach=721967;image)
![Hydroponic propagator](https://www.srgc.org.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=e511f0ffc06e3c0e44beac2a2fe91ac5&action=dlattach;topic=19566.0;attach=721969;image)