Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
. . . the 'double form' of Sanguinaria canadensis . . .
Quote from: KentGardener on December 19, 1973, 06:13:14 PM . . . the 'double form' of Sanguinaria canadensis . . . In case anyone cares, the most commonly accepted cultivar name is 'Multiplex'.
I have seen so many different names for what are obviously the same plant that..........I at first thought about typing this, and then I thought about typing that, and in the end decided to go for the safest option. 'double form'
The double bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis f. multiplex) is a lovely thing; when first unfolding, it always makes me think of an elegant waterlily. The plants sold in general commerce all come from one plant found, according to an account in Linc and Laura Foster's classic book Cuttings From A Rock Garden , in the spring of 1917 in a woods in Dayton, Ohio. Mr. von Webern who had purchased the woods and found the double bloodroot, fortunately sent out a couple of the plants; the original colony apparently eventually died out, but he had sent one plant to the Montreal Botanical Garden, which in turn distributed it into commerce. A few other double flowered bloodroot plants have since been found; in the southeast and perhaps in New England, as well as a pink flowered single. I don't know if any of the other doubles found have had as many extra petals as Mr. von Webern's plant. The doubles are very expensive, because they don't set seed so must (slowly) be propagated vegetatively. However, the $75 price I see charged by a certain well-known nursery is ridiculous.Various garden visitors here are bold enough to ask for "a piece" of some pretty scarce plants. More often than not, I'll get out a trowel; if ever I turn them down it's usually only when I know they'll kill the plant before the day is done. However, if somebody asked me to pot them up one or two of the double bloodroots, I'd laugh, and I'd laugh...
The early history of this plant is surprisingly obscure. I've read that it was found near Columbus, Ohio - but also that it was found at Dayton, Ohio! Perhaps the most reliable source is Hortus Third and its predecessors. Hortus Third (publ 1976) say 'Multiplex' and gives as (invalid) synonyms v. plena and cv. 'Flore Pleno'. Hortus Second (1941) calls it var. multiplex. Hortus, the first in the series, publ. 1930, does not mention a double form at all.None of the Hortus volumes mention where it was first found.Dear Google coughs up some interesting web pages when confronted with "double bloodroot". One, at http://iowagarden.blogspot.com/2008/04/double-bloodrootdont-even-ask.html says,
Quote from: Rodger Whitlock on August 31, 2009, 05:17:25 PMQuote from: KentGardener on December 19, 1973, 06:13:14 PM . . . the 'double form' of Sanguinaria canadensis . . . In case anyone cares, the most commonly accepted cultivar name is 'Multiplex'. True, though that name always makes me think of these fancy new-fangled cinema houses!