Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
There has been confusion in the past about Galanthus trojanus and Galanthus 'Trojan' - Oakwood showed Galanthus trojanus on the previos page of this thread and here is the link to a photo of G. 'Trojan' on Mark's snowdrop gallery : http://www.snowdropinfo.com/galanthus%20trojan.html
I didn't know I had a photo of 'Trojan'. I'll look it up and see where I took it - if I did
It seems that Galathus 'Trojan' was sold by an unidentified vendor at the Galanthus Gala in 2011 (and Steve Owen bought one). We know so little about it that it seems quite likely that it originates from that vendor. If it has never been "written-up" to formalise the name then it would not be a bad idea to change it to avoid confusion with the species trojanus. Perhaps 'Warrior' would be an apt substitution for 'Trojan'?I happened to mention this thread to Richard Bashford this morning and, as it turns out 'Trojan' was on of his own selections 'early on' chosen for its bulk and ability to increase and make a show in the 'S. Arnott' vein of things. Visitors to the garden admired the clone and it were given bulbs. At some point the name 'Trojan' was attached inspired by the phrase 'works like a Trojan' in the context of its value as a good garden plant. Its has nothing to do with G. trojanus and TBH I don't see a problem with both names being in use at the same. But I imagine its originator might be a bit miffed at someone suggesting alternative names for his snowdrop without first asking him!
Hi Emma have you seen my previous post about trojanus seeds and who is selling them?
Quote from: Alan_b on November 18, 2014, 07:13:12 AM It seems that Galathus 'Trojan' was sold by an unidentified vendor at the Galanthus Gala in 2011 (and Steve Owen bought one). We know so little about it that it seems quite likely that it originates from that vendor. If it has never been "written-up" to formalise the name then it would not be a bad idea to change it to avoid confusion with the species trojanus. Perhaps 'Warrior' would be an apt substitution for 'Trojan'?I happened to mention this thread to Richard Bashford this morning and, as it turns out 'Trojan' was on of his own selections 'early on' chosen for its bulk and ability to increase and make a show in the 'S. Arnott' vein of things. Visitors to the garden admired the clone and it were given bulbs. At some point the name 'Trojan' was attached inspired by the phrase 'works like a Trojan' in the context of its value as a good garden plant. Its has nothing to do with G. trojanus and TBH I don't see a problem with both names being in use at the same. But I imagine its originator might be a bit miffed at someone suggesting alternative names for his snowdrop without first asking him!Thank you Matt for the history of 'Trojan'