Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
I would be interested to know:1. Who is the audience for the eventual list and what do we expect they will do with the list? Do we anticipate it will influence them to do or not do something and if so what?2. Do we have a definitive list of criteria for evaluation? I agree with Brian, why would we exclude snowdrops obtained less than a year previously? If aesthetics are a factor, they cannot be time limited.3, How will snowdrops from other countries be handled, which almost by definition will be less common as they are more difficult to source?I am not at all sure as to the value of the exercise.
A footnote concerning Kew snowdrops. A wide variety is grown there, mostly very well, and most are well labelled (not all: what is the superb snowdrop grown in quantity around the Orangery? I could find no label). However, I was intrigued to find poor miffy specimens of two snowdrops which are amongst the very best here in the far north of England, 'Straffan' (originating in northern Ireland) and 'S. Arnott' (originating in south-west Scotland). This tended to confirm my theory that snowdrops which were selected in the north tend to thrive better in the north, and vice-versa. It appears that these northerners dislike Kew's hot dry climate.
... 'bog-standard' G. nivalis -
That's a rather good and different top ten for the connoisseur - not sure how many might be truly garden tried and tested but the nice thing is to have the personal information about growing them.