Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Cypripedium formosanum and Cypripedium plectrochilon in flower.
Wim, it strike me how similar C. plectrochilon is in regards with the C. arietinum, so I took a moment of procrastination to check it out. It seems that the accepted name isC. plectrochilum nowadays. Not surprinsingly that C. arietinum (Franch.) was given as an synonim at some point.
They are the same now? I thought C. arietinum was an American species and C. plectrochilon an Asian species. I wouldn't call them the same, there's no overlap of populations whatsoever and even though they are very similar there are some differences.
Of course they are not the same. I only said they are very look-alike. In the all too confusing FOC they still place C. arietinum Franch. (not valid anymore) as a syn. to C. plectrochilum. Cypripedium arietinum R.Br. - the valid name. All these little details....I just thought you may want to know about the name of your beautifully grown Cyp. http://www.theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/A/Orchidaceae/Cypripedium/
In the FOC it says Cypripedium arietinum Franchet (1885), not R. Brown (1813). The american species C. arietinum was described by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown from a herbarium piece in Kew. It seems the French botanist Adrien Franchet did describe a Cypripedium arietinum in Asia too, which is the same as C. plectrochilon??The Plantlist does not mention a Cypripedium arietinum described by Franceht though....It is interesting to read, of course, Gabriela. Thanks for the info.
Have to ask, is FOC Flora of China?
Thanks Steve, though I have no idea what you mean about your Fifian translation. I had never come across FOC though at a quick glance it looks interesting.
...Frustration is a very common feeling after using the FOC
Do you have to buy the book or is it Free Of Charge.