Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
I thought Latin or Latinised names were invalid for cultivars. Obviously more research is required. Edit : I wonder if Bowles originally named it 'Albus' & we are dealing with priority here?
Quote from: Lvandelft on January 17, 2009, 09:26:22 PMI saw the description of Bowles White as:Throat orange, flowers large, globular, pure white.Is this the case with Gerry's plant?Yes Luit, more-or-less. Though the flowers this year are not (so far) as large as they were last.
I saw the description of Bowles White as:Throat orange, flowers large, globular, pure white.Is this the case with Gerry's plant?
I not remember since which year it is not allowed more to use latinised forms in cultivar names, can't to find for a moment where is my copy of Codex. To elder cultivars still latinised forms are conserved.
Of course - BWh is hybrid as it never set seeds.
Quote from: Janis Ruksans on January 18, 2009, 09:37:48 AMOf course - BWh is hybrid as it never set seeds. Janis - do we know this? Could it not be a sterile triploid?
Luit, I couldn't open either of the Links.
Quote from: David Nicholson on January 17, 2009, 07:27:12 PMLuit, I couldn't open either of the Links.Luit, just to let you know both Links opened perfectly for me this evening. Don't know what I did wrong last night.
Crocus sieberi `Bowles' White' (as purchased from Potterton and Martin if I remember rightly in 1993), has once set seed for me. The seedlings were mainly pale lavenders and yellows, not unlike some of the cvijicii x veluchensis seedlings.