Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
A fine, healthy Oxalis you have there too. Pity the meeces don't dig and eat THOSE bulbs.
Oh but they do Lesley, and spread them about the plunge. I have even had the oxalis (Bermuda buttercup) grow up through a pot because the bulb was in the plunge directly below the drainage hole.
Many thanks for these pics Brian, allowing us all to look over your shoulder Interesting that the Cambridge Iris bakeriana differs markedly from others shown here on the Forum - rather like 'Cantab' in fact
Quote from: Brian Ellis on February 11, 2009, 10:25:35 PMQuote from: ashley on February 11, 2009, 07:16:31 PMInteresting that the Cambridge Iris bakeriana differs markedly from others shown here on the Forum - rather like 'Cantab' in fact Ashley I was most careful to take pictures of the labels as well as the Iris because of that, unfortunately it does not say anything about the acquisition on the label.Hmmm - does anyone have a digipic of Cantab? This one does not look like my slide from 15 years ago. The two shown look very similar (look at the falls) and it may be that neither is correctly labelled
Quote from: ashley on February 11, 2009, 07:16:31 PMInteresting that the Cambridge Iris bakeriana differs markedly from others shown here on the Forum - rather like 'Cantab' in fact Ashley I was most careful to take pictures of the labels as well as the Iris because of that, unfortunately it does not say anything about the acquisition on the label.
Interesting that the Cambridge Iris bakeriana differs markedly from others shown here on the Forum - rather like 'Cantab' in fact
Quote from: tonyg on February 12, 2009, 01:18:27 PMQuote from: Brian Ellis on February 11, 2009, 10:25:35 PMQuote from: ashley on February 11, 2009, 07:16:31 PMInteresting that the Cambridge Iris bakeriana differs markedly from others shown here on the Forum - rather like 'Cantab' in fact Ashley I was most careful to take pictures of the labels as well as the Iris because of that, unfortunately it does not say anything about the acquisition on the label.Hmmm - does anyone have a digipic of Cantab? This one does not look like my slide from 15 years ago. The two shown look very similar (look at the falls) and it may be that neither is correctly labelled Tony I would not be surprised if it was mislabelled as we were a little surprised by the state of some of the other plants, however that was the label it had -one of those nice black square jobbies with white printing
Leonid's 'Clairette' is absolutetly fabulous.
On the Old Forum John Forrest showed his I. bakeriana with 8-sided leaves (http://www.srgc.org.uk/discus/messages/283/5457.html, about quarter-way down the page), as well as ‘Cantab’ (http://www.srgc.org.uk/discus/messages/283/6250.html#POST4360) that matches Lesley’s (http://www.srgc.org.uk/discus/messages/283/16023.html#POST8856). Luit may well have posted reference examples from the Connisseur Collection last year but unfortunately I can’t find them. Nevertheless ‘Cantab’ seems to have pale falls & a yellow ridge (contrast the Cambridge plants). Rafa gives the description: bakeriana Fos. Southern Turkey, northern Iraq, western Iran. 4-6" (10-15 cm). Standards and styles bluish lilac; falls white with deep blue tips, lines, and blotches. 2n=20 (http://www.srgc.org.uk/discus/messages/139/24790.html#POST13083). No mention of yellow here (again, contrast the Cambridge plants). Other examples shown on that page have purple falls and lack yellow, like yours Tony (http://www.srgc.org.uk/smf/index.php?topic=2862.120), but different to John’s with dark blue falls & yellow/orange ridge. So evidently there are at least two distinct forms of bakeriana - or three if the Cambridge plants are also correct.