Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Hi all,Thanks for your admiring words. It allmost feels as if I created the plant myself and not just spotted it on a rainy sunday afternoon two years ago in a drift of regular white nivalis.My only intention was to show you a picture of this rather unusual (I thought) coloured Galanthus. I certainly did not intend to give these quiet little plants the fright of their lives by threatening them with horrible words as twinscaling, chipping, narcissus flies and other monsters .
Quote from: Robin Callens on March 02, 2009, 10:15:59 PMI certainly did not intend to give these quiet little plants the fright of their lives by threatening them with horrible words as twinscaling, chipping, narcissus flies and other monsters .You can be sure that the only way to keep these bulbs going is to scare them literally with a knife in the right hands. The Narcissus fly will read the headlines in it's newspaper This summer.
I certainly did not intend to give these quiet little plants the fright of their lives by threatening them with horrible words as twinscaling, chipping, narcissus flies and other monsters .
You can be sure that the only way to keep these bulbs going is to scare them literally with a knife in the right hands. The Narcissus fly will read the headlines in it's newspaper This summer.
Quite so Martin. I wonder how long it took Galanthus alpinus bortkewitschianus to bulk up, after all, it now covers ~6 hextares (60,000m2)? It has done so by vegetative means naturally as the flowers of this triploid (3n = 36) are infertile.
Quote from: Anthony Darby on March 03, 2009, 12:06:58 AMQuite so Martin. I wonder how long it took Galanthus alpinus bortkewitschianus to bulk up, after all, it now covers ~6 hextares (60,000m2)? It has done so by vegetative means naturally as the flowers of this triploid (3n = 36) are infertile....Also, if bortkewitschianus is a triploid clone (rather than a sexually reproducing population), then I don’t think it should have a botanical name, it should have a clonal name....
According to The Book; " Galanthus alpinus var. bortkewitschianus is known from only one restricted locality ... where it is said to form a single vegatatively propagating population covering five to six hectares. Artjushenko reports that it is sterile...".The only factor I can see that distinguishes bortkewitschianus from the mass of G. alpinus apart from the fact that it happens to be a sterile clone is that the bulb scales are described as yellowish whereas in other G. alpinus they are described as whitish. So I'm with Jim, in that I don't see the reason why bortkewitschianus is var. bortkewitschianus and not just bortkewitschianus
Quote from: Alan_b on March 03, 2009, 07:54:27 AMAccording to The Book; " Galanthus alpinus var. bortkewitschianus is known from only one restricted locality ... where it is said to form a single vegatatively propagating population covering five to six hectares. Artjushenko reports that it is sterile...".The only factor I can see that distinguishes bortkewitschianus from the mass of G. alpinus apart from the fact that it happens to be a sterile clone is that the bulb scales are described as yellowish whereas in other G. alpinus they are described as whitish. So I'm with Jim, in that I don't see the reason why bortkewitschianus is var. bortkewitschianus and not just bortkewitschianusSo should it not be Galanthus alpinus forma bortkewitschianus (or if you want to give it a clonal name Galanthus alpinus 'Bortkewitschianus')?
I hope Robin can cope with the deluge of interest his snowdrops have excited.