Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Quote from: mark smyth on October 01, 2009, 05:02:59 PM1. This was obtained in August as goulimyi leucanthus white form. Shouldn't it simply be goulimyi 'Alba'?2. Because of their height I'm thinking my pulchellus Alba is speciosus AlbaThere are no sharp line between typical goulimyi and var. leucanthus and I would prefer to regard it as goulimyi albus.Yours pulchellus looks more as speciosus albus (anthers are yellow, in pulchellus white), but possibly it is hybrid. Typical speciosus cultivar bringing name 'Albus' has pointed flower segments. See attached picture.Janis
1. This was obtained in August as goulimyi leucanthus white form. Shouldn't it simply be goulimyi 'Alba'?2. Because of their height I'm thinking my pulchellus Alba is speciosus Alba
Quote from: Janis Ruksans on October 01, 2009, 06:00:45 PMQuote from: mark smyth on October 01, 2009, 05:02:59 PM1. This was obtained in August as goulimyi leucanthus white form. Shouldn't it simply be goulimyi 'Alba'?2. Because of their height I'm thinking my pulchellus Alba is speciosus AlbaThere are no sharp line between typical goulimyi and var. leucanthus and I would prefer to regard it as goulimyi albus.JanisJanisMaybe the fact that Gulimyi leucanthus grows in large numbers in the wild ranked it as a var. level and differs it from The 'Albus,Album, Albidum' that are given to few plants that rarely or very rarely appear Albino.
Quote from: mark smyth on October 01, 2009, 05:02:59 PM1. This was obtained in August as goulimyi leucanthus white form. Shouldn't it simply be goulimyi 'Alba'?2. Because of their height I'm thinking my pulchellus Alba is speciosus AlbaThere are no sharp line between typical goulimyi and var. leucanthus and I would prefer to regard it as goulimyi albus.Janis
Ashley, Neustadts gastropod doesn't need to be gastropod anymore - he has a rotatable display now Re hadriaticus saundersianus and chrysobelonicus we already had one or two discussions here on the forum, without getting a reasonable answer. Both names were given by Herbert in 1847 - in a time when only a few hadriaticus were in cultivation. Meanwhile lots of collections were made and the whole variability of hadriaticus lead to the conclusion, that both names are invalid now. Wild hadriaticus populations are mixed with all kinds of throat colour (white, yellow, purple like in saundersianus) and flower colour from white to blue and even striped or feathered forms. So Annes plant is "just" one wonderful dark throated variant of the whole hadriaticus complex.
I have also formed the same opinion. I originally thought that there was believed to be geographical separation of ssp leucanthus. As I have not observed them in the wild I can only repeat what I have heard from other travellers - that pale or white forms occur in most areas of the distribution of Crocus goulimyi. If so the distinction is hardly worth subspecific rank. That said, the very pale often slightly bicolored forms are very attractive and it is useful to have a name to distinguish them by.One observation of my own which might counter the above argument: I have now raised Crocus goulimyi leucanthus from seed a number of times. I have had seed from wild plants and also raised 2nd generation plants from these. They have always bred true, all very pale or white flowered. There has not yet been a single lilac flowered offspring. This suggests some kind of genetic stability. Seed that I received of C goulimyi 'Main White' which arose from cultivated stocks of Crocus goulimyi (lilac flowered) bred all lilac flowered plants at the first generation. The 2nd generation gave around 20% white flowered plants. Ian Young has observed similar behaviour in seedlings of white forms of Crocus nudiflorus.So, does the stability of the 'white gene' in ssp leucanthus support the rank it is given? ... Hopefully someone with 'the knowledge' can advise.
Crocus niveusFrom Archibald seed (pop ref 348.806) ex a D. Hoskins coll., Greece, Lakonia, N of Pirgos Dirou.
By the way: In their natural habitat they also grow "outside" The plants always look better in the garden than in pots.