Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
From what I can see I would say crocus vernus ssp vernus. The purple tube is common in white forms. It is too big for ssp albiflorus.
I received this crocus as C. ancyrensis from a "specialist" bulb seller in USA however, the flower color is definitely incorrect. does anyone have an idea on the correct identification?my guess is Crocus tommasinianus Thank youRimmer SE Michiganusually Zone 5 (Zone 8 winter)
I am no good at spring crocus identification, especially from photos, but - the supposed C. laevigatus - some form of C. sieberi?
The not-ancyrensis photos would be easier to id if we had a side-shot as well as. To me they look like a commercial form of tommasinianus such as Whitewell Purple or Ruby Giant.
Hi This is the first flowering of NARGS 2008 #3207 labelled as C. laevigatus ex. White Mountains, Crete. it is very different from all the other C. laevigatus that i have. one corm sent up a bloom last fall and now with a few warm days, several more blooms have appeared in March.does this plant look correctly identified? Thank youRimmer SE Michigan, USA
The narrow leaves lead me to be fairly sure it is C tommasinianus rather than C vernus.
These, 100% sure, are crocus sieberi ssp sieberi. Crete, mountains, springtime flowering. A flower last fall would likely have been C laevigatus, also native to Crete but different, lower altitude habitat. Pergaps a mixed batch of Cretan seed? Good news is that they will be easy to separate by corms. C sieberi has globose corms with netted tunics. C leavigatus has corms with a pronounced pointy top half and hard, smooth corm tunics.