Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Fair enough , McMark, but surely you missed Richards pix on Reply 97 of page 7 of THIS very thread?http://www.srgc.org.uk/smf/index.php?topic=5087.msg141024#msg141024
Mark,I think many members of this forum are inclined to be "inconclusive" when asked to name a snowdrop from a posted photograph as they have found from experience that this is not the most reliable method of identifying a snowdrop and once an incorrect name is attached to a snowdrop it is inclined to stick with it and continue misnaming and further confusion.Paddy
Thanks Paddy, but I do understand that. Conversely, it might be beneficial in ID cases to say something like "no, your named double galanthus looks like a standard double nivalis" (offered without invective), or "it looks like a hybrid", or "it does not look like this or that named cultivar", or provide a photo link showing what the true plant looks like from a reliable web resource. You know, useful information that helps the learning experience and furthers the general understanding about these plants for forumists. I believe there is a level with which this can be done, without risking further confusion.
G. n. Fore Pleno is a great snowdrop for building up into drifts and it doesn't really matter what the inners look like when you are gazing at thousands of them
Galanthus "thingy" it is then.think it was given to me as double sharlockii.
Anyone know this snowdrop? It has huge elwesii leaves but they are plain green. It's not woronowii.
It could be Galanthus sp. ...