Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
And I would have rescued it from your compost heap and brought it home.... I like both forms!
In spite of the rainy a and cold weather which is quite unusual for the beginning of maymany of our plants give a fine display.
After collecting some informations from US-growers I planted it several times in a bed with very poor (sandy) limefree soil and in full sun.They flowered occasionally - but very poor and no seed set. Later on they became smaller and smaller - more dead than alive.I once got an another information that a dry periode in autumn which stops the growth of the leaves would be essentional for this species.We have rain all year round - a total of about 800 to 1000 mm (USDA zone 7 b).So I suppose that local conditions cause my bad results with this species.I would be glad if you'll tell me your opionion about this - especially concerning soil and rainfall!Gerd
Thanks for these great photos, information & links Mark 'V. pedata' & 'V. pedatifida' I've had from exchanges look more or less identical, but from comments elsewhere on the forum I assume they must be the latter. How are these two species distinguished?
When I lived in Seattle, 2-3 zones milder than my New England garden, I struggled with Viola pedata. Gerd, the climate there was very similar to what you report... USDA Zone 7 and 38" (950 mm) of rain. The problem was that the leaves and broad clasping leaf bases will persist in a milder climate, in the fall and winter becoming soggy and wet, rotting the thick central rhizome. Planting in full sun, in very well drained sandy soil (mostly sand, with a gravel mulch), AND cutting off all foliage in the late autumn did the trick, and then they would winter over just fine. Also, the slugs are partial to this plant, so a permanent diligently-replenished perimeter barrier of slug poison was necessary. Depending on one's outlook, it might not be worth the effort.