Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Can someone help by the identification of this Allium?Grows "wild" in a agriculture/horticulture school garden of a university. No label. Flowers now.
I see that John Richards has a couple of onions in his most recent Diary.....http://www.alpinegardensociety.net/diaries/Northumberland/+August+/293/
Either way, it is clearly at the very least closely related to the more familiar A. callimischon
Thank you, McMark. about this :QuoteEither way, it is clearly at the very least closely related to the more familiar A. callimischon.... can you tell me how close a relationship there might between the first of John's onions and A. callimischon? I confess to getting my onions well and truly stewed....
... Allium tauricolum (note: species spelling is disputed between tauricolum and tauricola) ...... A. tauricola (species spelling as listed in Flora of Turkey) ...
It seems that tauricola is the correct form.... I was interested to read John Richards' explanation of that....http://www.alpinegardensociety.net/discussion/northumberland/Diary+th+August+/426/"Thank you Margaret for helping to clarify this one. Regarding as I do Brian Mathew as close to God with respect to anything bulbous, I had assumed he was right in saying that Allium tauricola was correctly known as A. chlorurum, but even Homer nods I guess. If we can stay with the Classics for a second, perhaps I can share the benefit of an expensive and in this case not entirely wasted education by noting that when an epithet is ......-icola (meaning to inhabit), it always takes this form, whatever the ending of the genus, hence Allium tauricola, not A. tauricolum. I think the reason is that the word ....-icola is a noun in apposition, not an adjective, and is first declension feminine for some reason. As for the little blue onion, several of my books have this plant with pendent larger flowers as the Chinese A. beesianum, the Himalayan A. sikkimense having smaller erect flowers. I myself couldn't possibly comment as I received it as A. caeruleum (which it certainly ain't!)." JR.
Mark;Any idea what this Chinese species might be? It's about 50cm tall, and everything is triangular: leaves, scape, pedicels... Thin and slender bulb like most Chinese species, cannot remember what the tunic looked like unfortunately. Leaves are 1,5cm wide, can get the rest of the measurements if you need them