Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
a few from me, Viola hederacea (isn't that now something else, not even a viola?)
Hans, Narcissus elegans is awesome! Love it Now some actual discussion on the challenging cushion plants, the North American buckwheats or Eriogonum. It seems that the species E. androsaceum is one that "falls through the cracks", a legitimate species but one that does not show up much when doing a google search, and almost no reliable photos seem to be available. I checked the pages of James Reveal, the father of Eriogonum, at: http://www.plantsystematics.org/reveal/ but in the photo galleries there are no photos of E. androsaceum, although he has an entry for it being a legit species.http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=ERAN5I went searching the references, and found an article entitled "Some Elegant Eriogonums" by Roy Davidson, Bulletin of the American Rock Garden Society, Vol.34, Fall 1976, No.4, which reports: "a congested bun, forming a domed, rosy-tinted mound with brown-marcescent leaves below, the fresh ones pallid green cobwebbed with hairs, turning pretty pinkish and then to a soft brown-rose. Above this the flowers are a strong yellow, of mustard richness, and also with a rosy glow, topping off short stalks with a midway interruption of small leafy bracts. This might be sometimes listed as a taxonomic ally of E. flavum, from which it is said to differ markely in its compact habit and consequent greater appeal to the gardener; certainly it is rich reward in itself, a fairly glowing polster."From Cohan's photos, I can't make out whether there are some cauline leafy bracts on the flowering stems, and Lori as you point out, the floras report that this characteristic (mid stem bracts) is not necessarily consistent, although from what I can see in my research, E. flavum has such intermediate stem bracts, whereas E. androsaceum does not. Maybe Mr. Reveal could offer an opinion, his email is available on the link I provide.
certainly the habit is very very different from the E flavum which i saw in southern alberta--a far larger and more open plant(not large, but compared to these tiny things..), though still, to me, very desirable..
Maggi,There are many, many healthy and well-growing arbutus growing here in Ireland. It is naturalised in parts of the country. It is just that I haven't managed to keep it going here in the garden. Such a nice plant.Paddy
No, there are certainly no prominent, midstem bracts (as on E. flavum and E. umbellatum) on your plant, nor ever on the ones I see in abundance in certain areas around here.However, as I zoom in on my many photos of what I assumed to be E. ovalifolium, and try to apply the basis of E. ovalifolium having 3 bracts and no peduncles, and E. androsaceum having 5-7 bracts and stipes/peduncles, I'm starting to wonder now if the ones I see aren't actually E. androsaceum?? I haven't seen any flowers that were "strong yellow" (re. Davidson) on these plants though, not even as they age. (By the way, Moss/Packer's key also notes, as the final distinguishing feature that E. androsaceum has "flowers attentuate, with a stipe-like base" while E. ovalifolium has "flowers not attentuate, lacking a stipe-like base". I'm not seeing that they are exactly attenuate, but if I'm interpreting it correctly, there may be a stipe-like base.) Hmm, guess I'll have to dissect flowers next year to see if the tepals vary in shape from the outer flowers to the inner ones (as in E. ovalifolium)... ??As noted, it's definitely very curious that E. androsaceum is spoken of in glowing terms as a rock garden plant in several accounts, yet there seems to be essentially no photo record... !