Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Oh, so that is a joke?
Tony,certainly a case of 'famous last words'! With the increasing understanding of epigenetics, we will see another paradigm shift in relationships.
Re Crocus serotinus subsp. clusii. The list tells us that it is Brian Matthew who is responsible for the transfer from Crocus clusii J. Gay. Anyone who has valid reason to doubt the transfer can ask him about his reasons and try to persuade him that he was wrong - or that Crocus clusii J. Gay exists as a separate species. It may well be that Brian has found that all herbarium specimen available to him labeled as Crocus clusii J. Gay in fact were misnamed forms of serotinus - not knowing that Crocus clusii J. Gay is still around.A first approach could be to search the Kew Bulletine 32: 46 (1977). where the reasons might be given.
Maybe this is the problem, most of herbarium sheet are wrong. This crocus is the only Iberian species with reticulate tunics and I think it is C. clusii... if not it will be a new species without name.
Gerry,After 38 years in research and science I dare say a scientist shouldformulate new results via ideas and insight.
Later on in the evening listening to the radio I heard a statement made by a scientist a century ago saying 'Science has no further to go everything is now known'
As to the Plant List, I find its publication a bit premature, as it is still full of known errors, due to the slow movement of taxonomy. Take it with a grain of salt.Jamie
I profoundly disagree with Great Moravian's remarks on science in general & molecular phylogenetics in particular.
Quote from: Tony Willis on January 24, 2011, 02:41:40 PMLater on in the evening listening to the radio I heard a statement made by a scientist a century ago saying 'Science has no further to go everything is now known'I did not know you listened to the radio over a hundred years ago Göte
Quote from: Gerry Webster on January 28, 2011, 03:28:25 PMI profoundly disagree with Great Moravian's remarks on science in general & molecular phylogenetics in particular. There are taxonomists whose opinion about molecular interpreters is highly critical too.Using the necessary courteous phraseology of course.http://www.ingentaconnect.com/search/download?pub=infobike%3a%2f%2fiapt%2ftax%2f2010%2f00000059%2f00000006%2fart00001&mimetype=application%2fpdf