Snowdrops - the new testament

[mark smyth]

I heard a whisper that the new testament will not include the snowdrops in the first book.

[art600]

 

[chasw]

Is that the first and second books Mark?

[mark smyth]

first and second but wasnt the only difference the extra index?

[Gerard Oud]

So not the ones from the old testament

[chasw]

I think that there were a few ,and only a few different pictures,but I suppose it would be a rather thick book if they put all in it

[Hagen Engelmann]

where is the problem, Mark? We all are waiting for new cultivars and new pics. Because the older are in the bible, we have of course.

[GoodGrief]

I heard a whisper that the new testament will not include the snowdrops in the first book.

I heard it direct from the horse's mouth...

[johnw]

where is the problem, Mark? We all are waiting for new cultivars and new pics. Because the older are in the bible, we have of course.

I see no need unless there is new information that surfaces on the ones in Volume 1.  Hagen I wonder if they will give an estimate in €-$-₤ if one were to buy all the new ones.   

johnw

[mark smyth]

No problem at all but it would save me having to buy a new copy of the original. My copy is very dirty

[annew]

Rats -  - that means I'll have to buy a new copy of the Old Testament as mine has the dreadful index, and I have to look everything up in a printout of a proper index that a kind forumist sent me.

[gote]

 
Göte

[ashley]

Göte

Just an outbreak of religious fervour Göte

I find the species descriptions in CITES Bulbs very useful.  Are they based on the 1999 Davis book (or vice versa) does anyone know?

[Brian Ellis]

Rats -  - that means I'll have to buy a new copy of the Old Testament as mine has the dreadful index, and I have to look everything up in a printout of a proper index that a kind forumist sent me.

Perhaps they will put a complete index in the new one if we all ask for it!

[Alan_b]

Perhaps they will put a complete index in the new one if we all ask for it!

Other issues notwithstanding, a complete index covering both volumes is an extremely good idea.  I hope the authors follow your suggestion (if they weren't already intending to do this).